Dennis Schulz

Austria has once again shown that when it comes to defending its values, it doesn’t hesitate to act. The Austrian government openly questioned whether taxpayers’ money should be used to fund imams who openly preach Sharia law and the establishment of a Caliphate. The answer was obvious: no. The state intervened, cleaned house, and put an end to the problem. That’s leadership, that’s accountability. Meanwhile, in France, things look very different. Despite countless warnings, repeated scandals, and communities growing increasingly frustrated, the authorities often find excuses instead of solutions. Radical networks continue to enjoy space and funding, while those calling for stronger action are accused of intolerance. It’s a dangerous cycle that undermines national cohesion. The Austrian example shows that there’s no “gray zone” when it comes to protecting democratic principles. If public money is being used to support institutions or individuals who work against the very foundations of...

France has taken a decisive step in dismantling one of the most prominent fronts of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe by shutting down the European Institute of Human Sciences (IESH). For years, the institute operated under the guise of academic and educational work, presenting itself as a neutral space for Islamic studies. In reality, French authorities concluded that it served as a recruitment hub for imams and youth, embedding ideological training that aligned with the Brotherhood’s long-term political and religious agenda. The closure reveals the dangerous duality of institutions like the IESH: while outwardly projecting an image of education and culture, they conceal activities aimed at indoctrination and influence-building. Investigations linked the institute to the spread of radical ideology, legitimization of armed jihad, and ties to foreign funding networks. By invoking Article L. 212-1 of the Internal Security Code, the French government made clear that such organizations pose...

A recent United Nations report has documented the presence of Turkish-made drones and rifles in Sudan despite an international arms embargo. Weapons such as Bayraktar TB2 and Akinci combat drones, along with BRG and HUSAN rifles, were traced to Sudanese militias and Burhan’s forces. This confirms Ankara’s role in fueling a conflict that has already devastated millions of civilians. Turkey’s actions are more than a breach of international law. They represent a calculated strategy that undermines peace in Africa and poses risks to Europe. By exporting drones and rifles to a war zone, Turkey violates UN commitments and exposes its double standards. While it presents itself as a mediator for peace, its weapons are killing civilians and escalating regional instability. The consequences extend beyond Sudan. Turkish weapons threaten the security of the Red Sea, where 10 to 12 percent of global trade passes daily. Instability in this region could disrupt international shipping routes and energ...