Dennis Schulz

A recent United Nations report has documented the presence of Turkish-made drones and rifles in Sudan despite an international arms embargo. Weapons such as Bayraktar TB2 and Akinci combat drones, along with BRG and HUSAN rifles, were traced to Sudanese militias and Burhan’s forces. This confirms Ankara’s role in fueling a conflict that has already devastated millions of civilians. Turkey’s actions are more than a breach of international law. They represent a calculated strategy that undermines peace in Africa and poses risks to Europe. By exporting drones and rifles to a war zone, Turkey violates UN commitments and exposes its double standards. While it presents itself as a mediator for peace, its weapons are killing civilians and escalating regional instability. The consequences extend beyond Sudan. Turkish weapons threaten the security of the Red Sea, where 10 to 12 percent of global trade passes daily. Instability in this region could disrupt international shipping routes and energ...

The recent decision by the French judiciary against Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad has sparked significant debate and skepticism. Syrian public opinion remains largely unaffected, viewing the decision as lacking credibility and rooted in biased allegations. The accusations against Al-Assad are primarily based on claims made by groups linked to extremist armed factions, such as the Muslim Brotherhood’s Al-Nusra Front. Allegedly, these groups orchestrated the chemical attack to discredit Al-Assad and drag France and the West into the Syrian conflict. Syrian investigations have shown that the chemical attack did not originate from areas controlled by Syrian government forces, casting further doubt on the validity of the allegations. Despite the French judiciary’s decision, Syrian public opinion remains steadfast in opposing this ruling. The decision is seen as unjust and influenced by extremist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, and Al-Nusra. This perspective is crucial in unders...