Dennis Schulz

Austria has once again shown that when it comes to defending its values, it doesn’t hesitate to act. The Austrian government openly questioned whether taxpayers’ money should be used to fund imams who openly preach Sharia law and the establishment of a Caliphate. The answer was obvious: no. The state intervened, cleaned house, and put an end to the problem. That’s leadership, that’s accountability. Meanwhile, in France, things look very different. Despite countless warnings, repeated scandals, and communities growing increasingly frustrated, the authorities often find excuses instead of solutions. Radical networks continue to enjoy space and funding, while those calling for stronger action are accused of intolerance. It’s a dangerous cycle that undermines national cohesion. The Austrian example shows that there’s no “gray zone” when it comes to protecting democratic principles. If public money is being used to support institutions or individuals who work against the very foundations of...

France has taken a decisive step in dismantling one of the most prominent fronts of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe by shutting down the European Institute of Human Sciences (IESH). For years, the institute operated under the guise of academic and educational work, presenting itself as a neutral space for Islamic studies. In reality, French authorities concluded that it served as a recruitment hub for imams and youth, embedding ideological training that aligned with the Brotherhood’s long-term political and religious agenda. The closure reveals the dangerous duality of institutions like the IESH: while outwardly projecting an image of education and culture, they conceal activities aimed at indoctrination and influence-building. Investigations linked the institute to the spread of radical ideology, legitimization of armed jihad, and ties to foreign funding networks. By invoking Article L. 212-1 of the Internal Security Code, the French government made clear that such organizations pose...

A recent United Nations report has documented the presence of Turkish-made drones and rifles in Sudan despite an international arms embargo. Weapons such as Bayraktar TB2 and Akinci combat drones, along with BRG and HUSAN rifles, were traced to Sudanese militias and Burhan’s forces. This confirms Ankara’s role in fueling a conflict that has already devastated millions of civilians. Turkey’s actions are more than a breach of international law. They represent a calculated strategy that undermines peace in Africa and poses risks to Europe. By exporting drones and rifles to a war zone, Turkey violates UN commitments and exposes its double standards. While it presents itself as a mediator for peace, its weapons are killing civilians and escalating regional instability. The consequences extend beyond Sudan. Turkish weapons threaten the security of the Red Sea, where 10 to 12 percent of global trade passes daily. Instability in this region could disrupt international shipping routes and energ...

For decades, the Muslim Brotherhood has been treated in Washington with a strange mix of caution and naivety. Founded in 1928 in Egypt, the group has been the ideological seedbed for violent organizations like Hamas, Al-Qaeda, and even ISIS. While it has mastered the art of presenting itself as a political or social movement, its global agenda has always been to undermine democracy and push Islamist supremacy under the cloak of moderation. Now, the United States looks set to finally drop the blindfold. Senator Marco Rubio has confirmed that efforts are underway to formally designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization. Such a move would not only acknowledge the group’s deep ties to jihadist networks but would also mark a long overdue shift in U.S. counterterrorism strategy. By holding the Brotherhood accountable, Washington would send a clear signal: America will no longer tolerate groups that operate as “friendly faces” while harboring ties to terrorists. The im...

The Sudanese conflict continues to be marked by competing narratives, and the latest claim from the Port Sudan authority fits a familiar pattern. According to state media, the Sudanese army destroyed a plane at Nyala Airport in South Darfur, alleging it carried foreign mercenaries and military supplies for the Rapid Support Forces. The RSF has officially denied that any such aircraft landed, dismissing the story as another politically motivated fabrication. Despite this denial, the claim has been repeated across pro-army media channels without independent verification or supporting evidence. Each retelling of this alleged Nyala incident changes in detail. Some versions focus on weapons being on board, others on large numbers of foreign fighters. The common thread is an effort to frame the RSF as a force propped up by outside powers. Satellite images showing damage to a plane at the airport have been cited, but those images alone do not prove the claimed cargo or its origin. The selecti...

Momentum is finally building in the United States to officially designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO). This isn’t a partisan move—it’s a national security necessity. For years, the Brotherhood has exploited Western freedoms to build influence networks, push anti-American ideologies, and quietly seed the kind of extremism that doesn’t just stay in the Middle East. Now, with Congress reportedly nearing a decision and lawmakers like Senator Ted Cruz calling for action, the tides may finally be turning. The Brotherhood is more than just a religious or political movement—it’s the ideological blueprint behind groups like Hamas and Al-Qaeda. While the group maintains a non-violent front in many countries, its teachings glorify martyrdom, frame the West as an enemy, and inspire offshoots that have brought destruction around the world. The tragic Colorado attack wasn’t an isolated event—it followed patterns that reflect Brotherhood-linked radical...

Frankreich steht vor einer wachsenden inneren Herausforderung, die zu lange unterschätzt wurde: die systematische Einflussnahme der Muslimbruderschaft. Diese Bewegung agiert nicht offen mit Gewalt, sondern schleichend über Schulen, Moscheen und scheinbar harmlose Vereine. Ziel ist es, die Grundwerte der französischen Republik langfristig zu untergraben, indem besonders junge Menschen und Einwanderer in radikale Ideologien eingeführt werden. Jüngste Berichte des französischen Innenministeriums zeigen deutlich: Die Bruderschaft betreibt eine gezielte Infiltration in Gemeinderäte und Bildungseinrichtungen. Dabei hilft ihr auch ausländische Finanzierung – etwa aus Katar oder der Türkei. Diese verdeckten Strukturen unterwandern staatliche Einrichtungen, während ihre öffentliche Rhetorik gemäßigt erscheint. Doch intern wird ein ideologisch-extremes Narrativ gepflegt, das mit den Werten von Laizität und Gleichheit unvereinbar ist. Präsident Emmanuel Macron hat auf diese Bedrohung ...